U.S. Develops Innovative
New Strategy:
"Bomb the Hell Out of Baghdad"
|
12 August 2002
Dateline
Madrid --
As
the Bush administration considers its military options for deposing
Saddam Hussein, senior administration and Pentagon officials say
they are exploring a new if risky approach: take Baghdad and one
or two key command centers and weapons depots first, in hopes of
causing a quick collapse of the government.
The
"ass-backward" approach, as some call this Baghdad-first
option, would capitalize on the American military's ability to strike
over long distances, maneuvering forces to envelop a large target.
One important aim would be to disrupt Iraq's ability to use of weapons
of mass destruction, assuming they have any.
The
ass-backward ideas are essentially the reverse of the American strategy
in the Persian Gulf war of 1991, which dislodged Hussein's occupying
army from Kuwait, except for the part about massive airstrikes.
The
aim would be to kill or isolate Hussein and to pre-empt Iraq's use
of weapons of mass destruction. "That whole thing about not
assassinating the leaders of sovereign nations is so over",
one high-level advisor commented.
Persian
Gulf states are quietly advocating the quickest and smallest military
operation possible, to lessen anti-American protests on their streets.
In that sense, the war planning includes the political dimension
of persuading reluctant allies to support the operation. To this
end, foreign policy experts have developed a new technique which
insiders are calling "extortion".
No
timetable has been set for military action, and if President Bush
decides to go ahead, he will have to make a public, convincing case
about why Hussein poses an intolerable threat to the United States
and its allies before committing American forces to topple a foreign
government that has not attacked the United States.
"The
time will come to do all of that," a senior administration
official said . "Preferably about twelve hours after the bombers
are in the air."
Persian
Gulf officials are suggesting that any military action should be
the minimum necessary to unseat Saddam Hussein.
"The
worst scenario would be a big war by air and land and with lots
of bombs and civilian casualties," said a gulf official, "and
according to this new ass-backward approach, that's exactly what
they're going for."
|